<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Science Contradict Christianity?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clockbackward.com/2009/06/28/does-science-contradict-christianity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clockbackward.com/2009/06/28/does-science-contradict-christianity/</link>
	<description>A Mathematician Writes About Philosophy, Science, Rationality, Ethics, Religion, Skepticism and the Search for Truth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 07:51:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.clockbackward.com/2009/06/28/does-science-contradict-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-15117</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clockbackward.com/?p=365#comment-15117</guid>
		<description>Gabie, if God has this &quot;special timing&quot; that only he knows, why give Moses exact days that humans can relate to? Why even say a number(i.e. 6 days) if that number may not be the number in his &quot;special timing&quot; vocabulary? Science uses numbers to quantify information that our brain can process. Also, dust is not a micro-organism. If one wants to be purely subjective and interpret scripture to fit their own moral code, so be it. But to say that the Bible does not contradict science is incorrect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gabie, if God has this &#8220;special timing&#8221; that only he knows, why give Moses exact days that humans can relate to? Why even say a number(i.e. 6 days) if that number may not be the number in his &#8220;special timing&#8221; vocabulary? Science uses numbers to quantify information that our brain can process. Also, dust is not a micro-organism. If one wants to be purely subjective and interpret scripture to fit their own moral code, so be it. But to say that the Bible does not contradict science is incorrect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabie</title>
		<link>http://www.clockbackward.com/2009/06/28/does-science-contradict-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-12295</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 00:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clockbackward.com/?p=365#comment-12295</guid>
		<description>Everyone, the Bible doesn&#039;t contradict science! Who are we to tell what God&#039;s timing was? 1 day may possibly have been 6,000 years! Or more! And that humans were made from dust is essentally, humans were made from micro-organsims! I think we are looking way to deep into the Bible, as it is not ment to be used for scientific purposes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone, the Bible doesn&#8217;t contradict science! Who are we to tell what God&#8217;s timing was? 1 day may possibly have been 6,000 years! Or more! And that humans were made from dust is essentally, humans were made from micro-organsims! I think we are looking way to deep into the Bible, as it is not ment to be used for scientific purposes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clockbackward</title>
		<link>http://www.clockbackward.com/2009/06/28/does-science-contradict-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-4528</link>
		<dc:creator>clockbackward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 13:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clockbackward.com/?p=365#comment-4528</guid>
		<description>As this article explains, the sequence of events in Genesis does indeed contradict science, and it does so repeatedly. Furthermore, even if every creature that had ever lived had fossilized, and we had access to all of those fossils, there would be no clear dividing line between humans and non-humans (since evolution is an extremely slow and graduated process). Our choice of which creature to call the first human would be arbitrary, and there would be no reason to assume that this first &quot;human&quot; should be male rather than female.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As this article explains, the sequence of events in Genesis does indeed contradict science, and it does so repeatedly. Furthermore, even if every creature that had ever lived had fossilized, and we had access to all of those fossils, there would be no clear dividing line between humans and non-humans (since evolution is an extremely slow and graduated process). Our choice of which creature to call the first human would be arbitrary, and there would be no reason to assume that this first &#8220;human&#8221; should be male rather than female.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dimitar zdravkov</title>
		<link>http://www.clockbackward.com/2009/06/28/does-science-contradict-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-4527</link>
		<dc:creator>dimitar zdravkov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 12:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clockbackward.com/?p=365#comment-4527</guid>
		<description>I would like to present you information which is about to become a world sensation.As far as I`m concerned there is no connection until nowdays between Darwin`s theory and the version about the origin of the world in the Bible.According to the Bible the world has been created in six days,but according to the science this process has taken billions of years.If we exclude the difference in time and we pay attention to the SEQUENCE,we will see that there is no contradiction between both,but only the question-why in the Bible things happened so fast?There is an answer and it`s in the Bible itself.Moses described the creation from his own sight as an eyewitness.How could he have seen something happen before his existence?For forty days he has been at the mount Sinai where he got information about the past,present and future.The creation had been recreated to him there,he had seen how the already existing world had been made.The long process of evolution had been shown to him in the first six days and the SEVENTH day had been dedicated to human`s appearing.After that he had seen the difference between Adam`s origin and Eve`s one.Adam comes from the dirt in the process of evolution,but Eve comes from DNA material out his body,which marks another jump for the evolution or in other words-the missing section of the chain which science is looking for.The next Jump is coming...
If I contacted to you by mistake and this is the wrong address,please make sure that you send me the correct e-mail where I can find the people who are interested in sort of information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to present you information which is about to become a world sensation.As far as I`m concerned there is no connection until nowdays between Darwin`s theory and the version about the origin of the world in the Bible.According to the Bible the world has been created in six days,but according to the science this process has taken billions of years.If we exclude the difference in time and we pay attention to the SEQUENCE,we will see that there is no contradiction between both,but only the question-why in the Bible things happened so fast?There is an answer and it`s in the Bible itself.Moses described the creation from his own sight as an eyewitness.How could he have seen something happen before his existence?For forty days he has been at the mount Sinai where he got information about the past,present and future.The creation had been recreated to him there,he had seen how the already existing world had been made.The long process of evolution had been shown to him in the first six days and the SEVENTH day had been dedicated to human`s appearing.After that he had seen the difference between Adam`s origin and Eve`s one.Adam comes from the dirt in the process of evolution,but Eve comes from DNA material out his body,which marks another jump for the evolution or in other words-the missing section of the chain which science is looking for.The next Jump is coming&#8230;<br />
If I contacted to you by mistake and this is the wrong address,please make sure that you send me the correct e-mail where I can find the people who are interested in sort of information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

